THE SIMPLE TRUTH

Written by Logic Person-

I read the article in a daily newspaper about black students that ran amok because-they reason- Universities "discriminate " against them!

On eye level- we across the ocean- might tend to go for the "Ahhh Shame" liberal side, but let's be hypothetical and logic about Africa:

1- I might be wrong- but as far as I can remember, no African Independent country has ever marginally succeeded in turning the country into a first world contingent. Africa- for most part of it- is always poor and starving. O.k- they blame the West for raping Africa's resources- thus the reason why they are permanently on the begging list.

Now- let's scrutinize this argument. Take Zimbabwe- ex Rhodesia- for a second. Before black Independence- whites ruled the country under Ian Smith. Remember- It was still a African country- on the same continent- and the same geographical layout. Question: Why did the country then prosper- and not only prospering- but excelled prosperity to such an extend that it was called "The breadbasket" of Africa due to it's farming and production capabilities?

When the Nkomo and Mugabe regime took the country by guerrilla force- and the white government of Smith was pushed aside- what was different in the scenario that unfolded into a total collapse of the breadbasket of Africa to a country staring total inhalation in the face today?

Look next to South-Africa. When the white government was in place- discipline and order prevailed- and that country prospered to a first world competitor in many a level- from producing food- to a world leader in many other facets. When the ANC regime took over- we observe a similarity in the modus operandi as with Zimbabwe, and today- South Africa and Zimbabwe are equally corrupt and in a mess.

What is the similarity between this two once prosperous countries? What happened in between the white relinquish and today's regimes of that countries? Both had many a opportunity to excel even more. The answer must be with the type of management in place at the time of occurrences. The answer then become simple- even for the most liberal hardliner- simple economics and mathematics: The people in government of that specific country are not capable of running a show of that size. We see the same line running through Portuguese administrated Mozambique, French controlled Cote De Ivory- and British controlled Kenya. Bottom line is: Where whites rule a country- there is stability. Black Africa is - as yet- definitely NOT on the same managerial level as their white counterparts- that is the simple fact!

My closing argument is this: If black Africans was at any stage- and this is a simple conclusion- capable of managing a country on the same level as whites in Europe or America- why then are the whole of Africa staggering under a burden of hunger, corruption and wars? Why can't Africans show the world what they preach and kill for: The fact that they are equal to whites on all levels? Simple conclusion: Black Africa will never be able to stand on her own two feet, for the despots running the continent of Africa- has no interest in continental prosperity, but are mere confisticles that are power hungry and will flatten all around them for self enrichment.
Africa is living in a big lie, a pipe dream that will never emerge from the status- a continent full of beggars and hooligans, the latter ruling the other. South Africa was just the final tip of Africa that joined all the other countries in Africa to be ruled by incompetent despots- and merged Africa now as a whole third world continent, build on lies, corruption, racism, murder and denial.